Skip to main content

DISABILITY AND GUN OWNERSHIP printed LDR July 21,2015

If you are a gun owner who receives a Social Security disability check from the U.S. Treasury but you have chosen, for whatever reason, to have someone help you manage your finances, whether you are just forgetful or not good at keeping your checkbook balanced, and have asked for help from a family member or another fiduciary, the Obama administration has a plan in the works to take your guns away from you.

The Executive Order is part of the President’s plan to strengthen gun control after the shooting incident at Sandy Hook elementary school in 2012, when twenty school children were massacred by a young man from the community.

The plan, which is among 23 executive orders issued by the President to the Department of Justice, could affect millions whose disability payments are handled by others in an effort to bring the Social Security Administration into line with laws that prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, illegal immigrants and others.

It is consistent with Surgeon General Vivek Murthy’s written philosophy that “guns are a health care issue.” In an interview with NPR he stated that “violence of all kinds is a public health issue” and that he wanted to “find a way that we can reduce violence in America.”

Murthy was sworn in as Surgeon General in April. In early June Senator Edward Markey (D-MA) and Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) introduced legislation to authorize the Center for Disease Control and Prevention to give $60 million tax-payer dollars to anti-gun activists to conduct research attempting to show gun violence is a disease.

The language of federal gun laws restricts gun ownership to people unable to manage their own affairs due to “marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition or disease.”

Identification of disability check recipients would come about through the use of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, and would use the same standard and criteria as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Approximately 4.2 million adults receive monthly benefits that are managed by “representative payees”.

The ban would keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people but would also include people who have a bad memory or a hard time balancing a checkbook due to their age, even if there’s never been a question raised about them or they have never been so much as accused of a crime.

The background check for gun ownership was started in 1993 by Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, named for James Brady, White House Press Secretary, who was partially paralyzed after being shot in the 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan.

The NICBCS maintains databases containing more than 13 million records of felons, illegal immigrants, fugitives, dishonorably discharged service members, drug addicts and domestic abusers.

Gun stores use the NICBCS at the point of sale and are required to run names of potential buyers through a computerized check system. State agencies, local police and federal agencies are also required to enter names into the databases but the system has proved to have loopholes and inconsistent reporting.

The Executive Order referred to in this column requires the DOJ to ensure federal agencies are complying with existing law on reporting to the NICBCS. The VA has been entering names into the system since its beginning. About 177,000 veterans and survivors of veterans are in the system.

The VA reports names under a category in the gun control regulations known as “adjudicated as mental defective” with the only criterion being that somebody has been appointed a fiduciary. More than half of the names on the VA list are people 80 years of age or older and suffering from dementia, but that category also includes anybody found by a “court, board, commission, or other lawful authority” to be lacking “the mental capacity to contract or manage his own affairs” for a wide variety of reasons.

Under the Executive Order, Social Security would be required to report names under the same “mental defective” category. About 2.7 million are now receiving disability payments for mental health problems, a potentially higher risk category for gun ownership. There are 1.5 million more who have finances handled by others for a variety of reasons.

Dr. Marc Rosen, a Yale psychiatrist, who has studied how veterans with mental health problems manage their money, says just because someone has been judged incapable of managing their funds does not mean they are dangerous or violent or unsafe.

He said some vets may avoid seeking help for mental health problems out of fear they would have to give up their guns.

Art Ne’eman, a member of the National Council on Disability, would oppose any policy that used assignment of a “representative payee” as a basis to take any fundamental right from people with disabilities.

The Department of Justice has been drafting its policy outside of public view, and until last week even the NRA was unaware of it. Chris W. Cox, Chief Lobbyist of the NRA, issued the following statement: “If the Obama administration attempts to deny millions of law-abiding citizens their constitutional rights by executive fiat, the NRA stands ready to pursue all available avenues to stop them in their tracks.”


House and Senate versions of the Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act are currently pending in the U.S. Congress. The language of the Act which deals solely with the Veterans Administration but would probably be amended to include the Social Security Administration under the Executive Order dealing with disability benefit check recipients reads as follows:

(This Act) “ Prohibits, in any case arising out of the administration of laws and benefits by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (VA), any person who is mentally incapacitated, deemed mentally incompetent, or experiencing an extended loss of consciousness from being considered adjudicated as a mental defective for purposes of the right to receive or transport firearms without the order or finding of a judicial authority of competent jurisdiction that such person is a danger to himself or herself or others.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COMMUNION ON THE MOON

Gratitude makes sense of our past, brings peace for today, and creates a vision for tomorrow. (Melody Beattie) Americans need a day dedicated to gratitude. I have noticed that in the lineup of most of our holidays that Thanksgiving is perhaps the one least given over to secularism - the one we still observe in a traditional fashion. We need it to keep our focus clear and to teach our children what it means to be thankful for family, friendship and faith. We need a time to gather around the table with extended family and enjoy turkey and dressing and gravy, two kinds of potatoes, cranberries, hot rolls, green bean casserole, pumpkin pie and whipped cream. We need it, not for the calories, but to create an awareness that there are those who don’t have those blessings, because in the hectic pace of our everyday lives we tend to forget those in need. Family and food are important, but above all else, Americans need a rededication to our faith. Faith brought the pilgrims to the ne...

My Facebook Message To Readers

 I posted this on my Facebook recently to let my Facebook friends know what to expect from my revamped page. A personal note for my special Facebook friends. No one is getting this but you! My Facebook posts have evolved through the years. I still like to make my friends laugh with a silly story or a joke or a cartoon, or get you caught up in a drama that seemingly could only happen to me, or just sharing a memory in a special photo, but more and more I am trying to post words that will inspire you or encourage you. I also like to post informational articles about subjects that might interest you - something you didn’t have time to read or watch. And you know of course that I love to read and especially write poetry so I will share lots of "rhyme and reason" with you, too. My days revolve around the computer, doing research on subjects in which I am interested and want to pass on to you, or surfing Facebook to keep up with my friends. I am not lazy. Unless you are pretty much...

SIGNERS OF DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

  I wrote this for the newspaper several years ago. Not political. Just history about the signers of the Declaration of Independence but extremely interesting. Not because I wrote it, but because it is history we have either forgotten, or maybe never learned it in school to begin with. Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence? Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured. Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War. They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated, but they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well ...